Sony DRU-810A: New Chipset, New Performance
by Purav Sanghani on October 28, 2005 12:05 AM EST- Posted in
- Storage
Chipset Information
Sony has switched chipset manufacturers, yet again; this time, using not only the Philips Nexperia chipset with the PNX7860E recording engine and TZA1047HL analog pre-processor, which we found in the BenQ DW1640A as well as the Plextor PX-740A, but also the exact same circuit layout. The only difference between the Sony and the other two is the buffer memory. Sony uses ESMT (Elite Semiconductor Memory Technology) chips in the DRU-810A.
Take a look at what we should expect from the DRU-810A.
To further confirm these specifications, we grabbed a screenshot from Nero’s InfoTool v.3.06.
We have also taken a screenshot from DVD Info Pro’s scan of the DRU-810A.
Sony has switched chipset manufacturers, yet again; this time, using not only the Philips Nexperia chipset with the PNX7860E recording engine and TZA1047HL analog pre-processor, which we found in the BenQ DW1640A as well as the Plextor PX-740A, but also the exact same circuit layout. The only difference between the Sony and the other two is the buffer memory. Sony uses ESMT (Elite Semiconductor Memory Technology) chips in the DRU-810A.
Take a look at what we should expect from the DRU-810A.
Sony DRU-810A Feature List | ||
DVD Write Performance | DVD+R | 16x: 22.16MB/s (CAV), 12x: 16.62MB/s (P-CAV), 8x: 11.08MB/s, 4x: 5.54MB/s (ZCAV), 2.4x: 3.324MB/s |
DVD+RW | 8x: 11.08MB/s (ZCAV), 4x: 5.54MB/s (ZCAV), 2.4x: 3.324MB/s | |
DVD+R DL | 8x: 11.08MB/s (PCAV), 4x: 5.54MB/s (ZCAV), 2.4x: 3.324MB/s | |
DVD-R | 16x: 22.16MB/s (CAV), 12x: 16.62MB/s, 8x: 11.08MB/s (P-CAV), 6x: 4x: 5.54MB/s, 2.4x: 3.324MB/s, 1x: 1.385 (CLV) | |
DVD-RW | 6x: 8.31MB/s (ZCAV), 4x: 5.54MB/s (ZCAV), 2.4x: 3.324MB/s | |
DVD-R DL | 8x: 11.08MB/s, 4x: 5.54MB/s, 2.4x: 3.324MB/s | |
CD Write Performance | CD-R | 48x: 7.2MB/s (CAV), 40x: 6.0MB/s (CAV), 32x: 4.8MB/s (PCAV), 24x: 3.6MB/s (PCAV), 16x: 2.4MB/s (ZCAV), 12x: 1.8MB/s (ZCAV) |
CD-RW | 32x: 4.8MB/s (PCAV), 24x: 3.6MB/s (PCAV), 16x: 2.4MB/s, 10x: 1.5MB/s, 4x: 600KB/s (ZCAV) | |
Media Read Performance | DVD-ROM | 16x CAV, 12x CAV, 8x CAV, 6x CAV, 4x CAV |
CD-ROM | 48x CAV, 40x CAV, 32x CAV, 24x CAV, 16x CAV, 10x CAV | |
Supported DVD Modes and Formats | -DVD-ROM, DVD-Video, Multi-border, Multi-session, DVD+VR, DVD-VR DVD+R: Disc at Once, Multi-session, Incremental Recording DVD+R DL: Disc at Once DVD+RW: Sequential Write, Random Access Write, DVD-R: Disc at Once, Multi-border recording, Incremental recording DVD-RW: Disc at Once, Multi-border recording, Incremental recording, Restricted Overwriting, DRT-DM |
|
Supported CD Modes and Formats | - CD-DA, CD-Extra, CD-ROM Mode-1, CD-ROM Mode-2, CD-ROM XA, Photo-CD, Video-CD, Multi-session, CD TEXT, CD-I, CD+G, Mixed CD - Track at Once, Disc at Once, Packet Write (variable and fixed), Session at Once |
|
Access Time | <150ms (CD/DVD) | |
Buffer | 2MB | |
Interface | EIDE/ATAPI |
To further confirm these specifications, we grabbed a screenshot from Nero’s InfoTool v.3.06.
We have also taken a screenshot from DVD Info Pro’s scan of the DRU-810A.
18 Comments
View All Comments
LoneWolf15 - Monday, October 31, 2005 - link
Perhaps because no-one wants to spend $90 going through THREE burners or $120 through FOUR burners before finding the ONE burner that has broad media compatibility with few recording errors, at a decent speed.
Some burners work great --with two brands of media only, and are horrible with the rest. Some burners don't work at their claimed max burn-speed with 90% of the high-speed media out there. Some burners write media well, but read it poorly. And since blank media is rarely manufactured by the vendor on the label (i.e. Verbatim, who has used MCC, Moser Baer, Taiyo Yuden, and perhaps others to supply their media, and this is similar to other vendors' track records) how do you know what media you're getting? The only solution is to get a burner that does a good job with most media.
I don't know about you, but I think reviewing a $30 burner is definitely worth it. And by-the-way, I don't think I've seen a quality burner for less than $40 at this point, and for me that's still money I don't want to piss away.
GoatMonkey - Friday, October 28, 2005 - link
I had been wondering about these questions for a while. Whatever happened to the dream of having a system with no more regular ATA? Why is nobody except Plextor using SATA for the connection?I think I know the answer now that I own the Plextor SATA DVD burner. Virtually no motherboards support it. The drive worked fine for a while, but apparently something changed that doesn't allow the drive to work anymore. It passes the internal test burn, but won't do anything in Windows except read discs.
Maybe if some other companies would make drives like this there would be some BIOS patches to motherboards to allow them to work. Really annoying. I don't want the big fat ribbon cables anymore.
RyanVM - Friday, October 28, 2005 - link
Have you tried getting in touch with Plextor? For as much as you paid for that drive, I'm more than willing to bet they'd replace it.That being said, I'm still waiting for AT to review the PX-716(S)A. How that drive has been out for so long and not gotten a review from them is beyond me.
nullpointerus - Friday, October 28, 2005 - link
I once heard from a tech support rep that while SATA supports removable media drives, there is no standard for media change notification. If that's true, then I don't see how there can be a SATA media-burning standard.Maybe Anandtech could look into this and post a blurb about it in their next DVD burner roundup? I'm sure many people would be interested.
Niv KA - Friday, October 28, 2005 - link
The only thing I have from Sony in my house is an old PS1 and a very old camera(Hi8) that I got from my father when he bought a new DV camera. The PS1 I am happy with,exept it has not been turned on in 2 and a half years(my fault, no time), and the camera, well it works and that is all, I use it frequently, but it is because I can't aford anything better.deathwalker - Friday, October 28, 2005 - link
Well lets see here...Sony $100+, Benq $40...hmm..once again as is the case all the way across the various product lines, Sony trys to command a premium for their name. Bah..humbug. The very reason I don't have any sony products in my home. There products are general OK..but a lot of companies make OK products and for much less $.Stefan - Friday, October 28, 2005 - link
Sony has matched the performance, but I still say that the BenQ 1640 is the best drive available. It has all around great performance and is one of the least expensive units on the market.Darkmatterx76 - Saturday, October 29, 2005 - link
all that and no lightscribe... *sigh* I've been waiting for a good drive with everything plus lightscribe...